Prediction of Naomi Parkinson vs Edith Kurtz Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
N. Parkinson vs E. Kurtz

Naomi Parkinson

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

121

Age

134

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Edith Kurtz

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

121

Age

134

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Parkinson 1 - 0 Kurtz

They have played 2 sets in total, with Naomi Parkinson winning 2 and Edith Kurtz winning 0. The last match between Naomi Parkinson and Edith Kurtz was at the Bala, 05-06-1933, Round: SF, Surface: Clay, with Naomi Parkinson getting the victory 6-1 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Parkinson	1
Kurtz	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(SF) Bala(06-05-33)

Stats

Naomi Parkinson

Edith Kurtz

N. Parkinson vs E. Kurtz H2H Profile

N. Parkinson	Stats	E. Kurtz
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
65.63% (42-22)	Career Total W/L	58.18% (32-23)
1	Clay	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

N. Parkinson vs E. Kurtz Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Naomi Parkinson has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Edith Kurtz has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Naomi Parkinson, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Edith Kurtz has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Naomi Parkinson has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Edith Kurtz has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Naomi Parkinson has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Edith Kurtz winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Naomi Parkinson has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 100% (W/L 9/0), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 23/18). Edith Kurtz has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 100% (W/L 7/4), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 1/1).
Player level: In the last year, Naomi Parkinson has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Edith Kurtz has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Naomi Parkinson winning 1 times and Edith Kurtz being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Naomi Parkinson winning 2 and Edith Kurtz winning 0.
The last match between Naomi Parkinson and Edith Kurtz was at the Bala, 05-06-1933, Round: SF, Surface: Clay, with Naomi Parkinson getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Naomi Parkinson has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Edith Kurtz has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Naomi Parkinson has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Edith Kurtz has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Naomi Parkinson has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Edith Kurtz has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Naomi Parkinson vs Edith Kurtz Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

N. Parkinson vs E. Kurtz H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

N. Parkinson	Stats	E. Kurtz
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	4
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

N. Parkinson Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
White Sulphur Springs Autumn - 08-10-1934
Theodosia SmithT. Smith	L	6-0 6-2	Stats
Longwood Bowl - 06-08-1934
R3 Norma TaubeleN. Taubele	L	3-6 6-1 6-2	Stats
East Hampton - 30-07-1934
R3 Kay PearsonK. Pearson	W	6-3 4-6 6-4	Stats
R4 Esther BartoshE. Bartosh	L	6-3 6-0	Stats
Seabright - 24-07-1934
R3 Maud LeviM. Levi	L	6-3 4-6 6-2	Stats

View All

E. Kurtz Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Bala - 05-06-1933
SF Naomi ParkinsonN. Parkinson	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
Mrs Frank HarperM. Frank	W	6-3 6-8 6-3	Stats
Philadelphia District - 12-09-1932
R3 Mrs Harold HaabestadM. Harold	W	6-1 6-0	Stats
R4 Laura PittengerL. Pittenger	L	6-3 6-1	Stats
Haverford - 06-06-1932
R4 Anne PageA. Page	L	8-6 6-4	Stats

View All

N. Parkinson vs E. Kurtz Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

N. Parkinson	Stats	E. Kurtz
65.63% (42/22)	YTD Win/Loss	58.18% (32/23)
65.71% (92/48)	Sets Win/Loss	55.86% (62/49)
57.98% (701/508)	Games Win/Loss	54.99% (512/419)
100.00% (9/0)	Clay Win/Loss	50.00% (1/1)
56.10% (23/18)	Grass Win/Loss	57.14% (24/18)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
50.00% (1/1)	Slam W/L	50.00% (1/1)
66% (41/62)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	57% (29/51)
38% (6/16)	Deciding Set Win %	56% (5/9)
87% (45/39)	1st Set Won, Won Match	93% (28/26)
13% (45/6)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	7% (28/2)
12% (17/2)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	13% (23/3)